The artifact

The sheet the planner opens on Monday.

Same forecast, same file, same system of record. One column changed, and a footer appeared under it that no forecasting tool currently prints: what the interval above actually covered the last time anyone checked.

Replenishment plan · week of 2025-12-2295% service levelcalibrated on 624 held-out SKU-weeks
SKUForecastOld order-up-toCalibrated order-up-toChange
SKU-1180
Cable, USB-C 2m
88105132+27
SKU-1425
Cable, USB-C 1m
117136168+32
SKU-2044
Filter cartridge
161183220+37
SKU-2390
Stylus, replacement tip
196221262+41
SKU-3312
Hub, 7-port
235262307+45
SKU-3808
Stand, monitor arm
293323373+50
SKU-4901
Desk mat, large
372406462+56
SKU-5140
Keyboard, compact
440477538+61
SKU-5507
Battery pack 10k
509549615+66
SKU-6055
Webcam, 1080p
597640712+72
SKU-6720
Charger, 65W
744792872+80
SKU-7314
Charger, 30W
9209741062+88
Coverage note. The interval this sheet used to print covered 65.5% of held-out weeks against a stated 95.0%, and demand ran past its upper bound in 104 of 624 SKU-weeks. The calibrated interval covered 95.8% and was exceeded in 24. Both numbers are counted on weeks that were not used to build either interval.
What the planner does with it

Nothing new. The order-up-to level goes into the same system it always went into. The difference is that the service level written on the plan is now the service level the warehouse experiences, so when someone asks why a SKU stocked out there is a number to point at instead of an argument.

What it will cost them

More stock. Every calibrated bound on this sheet is higher than the one it replaces, because the old one was too low. The honest version of this pitch is not that conformal saves money; it is that the missing width was already being paid for in expedites and lost sales, and now it is visible and choosable.

What this does not decide

It does not choose your service level, set reorder policy, or touch the point forecast. It answers one question, which is what a stated interval actually covers, and then makes the stated one true. If a 95% service level is too expensive for a SKU, that is a business call, and the right response is to pick a lower level deliberately rather than to keep a 95% label on a band that delivers 65.5%.